Thanks, Renee. While using the People View is, indeed, a work around, it is not ideal. When sorting by the Reference Number column, the data is treated as text and therefore, not sorted numerically (i.e. they show as 1, 10, 100, 2, 3, 4, etc. instead of 1, 2, 3, 4 10, 100, etc.) and I find no way of changing that. I realize some researchers use an alphanumeric numbering system so the data type would have to be user definable.
There have been 2 items by ChuxGenes (Search limited from 21-January 20)