"Male" and "Female" don't seem to be enough anymore, with flexible gendering, to define sex . I have a female by birth certificate who is self-identifying as male. There is no category beyond "male", "female" and "unknown". What are others doing in similar situations?

#1
Posted 07 January 2019 - 08:47 AM
#2
Posted 07 January 2019 - 10:43 AM
I just encountered this as well. I'm not really sure how to handle it. This person feels mis-gendered and wants to have operations etc.
Do you record the gender they were born with? The one they feel in their heart? Or wait until hormones and operations have changed the genitals?
This is too complex for a single letter flag, though that is a start.
It will definitely require a bit more explanation for the family and future generations to understand.
I haven't recorded anything yet as I'm the only person in the family who knows about it and this individual isn't ready to have that conversation.
#3
Posted 07 January 2019 - 11:09 AM
If they won't be offended to badly I would mark them "Unknown" for now. Then when programs and websites catch up with society you can search for everyone marked "Unknown" and use whatever solution the industry settles on. The issue genealogy software programmers are having is that there is no way to transfer other sex options using the current GEDCOM standard, or through websites APIs.
If they are offended then I would simply ask them how they would like you to record it. Then add notes as needed.
RootsMagic
#4
Posted 13 January 2019 - 05:54 PM
Everybody gets listed with their BIRTH Name, Date, Place and SEX. It doesn't matter if a name changes for marriage, or Pen Name Etc.. Birth details remain the same. If a person opts to gender identify differently, it happens well after birth, and does not change that fact. I am a Celiac.. genetic...yup, others are predisposed to thousands of other things, including gender identity and gays. Does everyone with a genetic predisposition to something want it as a fact in somebody's Family Tree, I think not. I personally would use a Misc. note and Privitaise it, unless instructed by the individual.
#5
Posted 13 January 2019 - 06:51 PM
For the very few that think they should have been the other sex, life does not always deal us a hand that we want. I always wanted to be rich and successful but it wasn't meant to be. There are but TWO sexes, that's all. Some people want to be the King or Queen of England, but they're NOT! There is MALE, or FEMALE. Whatever the good Lord dealt you at birth is what you are. Sex is a physical state, not a fad or a dream.
#6
Posted 25 January 2019 - 10:19 AM
I agree with leaving these as Unknown. I think it could get very confusing if you start to include some but not others. Here's a list of the more common ones today (below). And the other issue is that many of these people (lots of teens) tend to change their minds over time which may or may not make it to your tree (probably wouldn't). Where does it end? My opinion is that it ends with Male, Female, and Unknown. I don't mean to offend anyone at all, but it seems like this would become extremely difficult to maintain and somewhat political.
Here's the list:
#7
Posted 05 December 2020 - 08:23 AM
In the world of DNA testing, knowing a person's sex at birth can become important, especially for yDNA and mtDNA testing plus for X-chromosome tracing. If a person is transgender, then knowing when the sex change occurred may become important. Personally, I think that sex should be what they were born with and "facts" should be used for tracking sexual preference and transgender changes.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Sex
Product Support - Current Versions →
FamilySearch Family Tree →
Comparing my roots person with online Person + ClipboardStarted by sandrabartman, 05 Aug 2018 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Product Support - Current Versions →
RootsMagic 7 →
Discussion →
Setting DefaultsStarted by sandrabartman, 05 Aug 2018 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Product Support - Current Versions →
RootsMagic 7 →
Discussion →
Gender IdentificationStarted by Charles640, 14 Mar 2018 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Product Support - Current Versions →
RootsMagic 7 →
Discussion →
Cannot get Father - mother fields correctStarted by marsbonnie, 04 Feb 2017 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Product Support - Older Versions →
RootsMagic 6 →
Discussion →
Edit Person bugStarted by Archie Gilbert, 26 Sep 2016 ![]() |
|
![]() |