Jump to content


Photo

(Mis)use of place field


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 CherylCh

CherylCh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts

Posted 13 August 2017 - 03:11 PM

Will RM blow a gasket if I use the place field for something like a URL, as opposed to a traditional place name?



#2 zhangrau

zhangrau

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1179 posts

Posted 13 August 2017 - 04:20 PM

I don't think so. RM doesn't seem to any real internal checking of what's been entered in the place name field. You can use the Place Finder or the Gazetteer to check for accuracy, but both of those are manual operations. You can ask for all Place Names to be geo-coded, in which case RM simply ignores entries that are not recognizable as a Place Name.

 

You don't say WHY you'd like to put a URL into the place field, and I'm curious to hear your explanation.



#3 TomH

TomH

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5556 posts

Posted 13 August 2017 - 07:22 PM

If you're happy with how they are brought out on-screen and in reports, why not?

Tom user of RM7230 FTM2017 Ancestry.ca FamilySearch.org FindMyPast.com
SQLite_Tools_For_Roots_Magic_in_PR_Celti wiki, exploiting the database in special ways >>> Rmtrix_tiny.png app, a growing bundle of RootsMagic utilities.


#4 Gina

Gina

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35 posts

Posted 13 August 2017 - 07:58 PM

I use the Place field for DNA testing services (Ancestry.com, 23andme.com, etc.) It works out well for me.