Queries and Color-Coding
Posted 24 March 2014 - 12:54 PM
Wish Wish Wish ideas
3) Save a Search for People to Include by datafields -- not the results of the search, but the search itself. After carefully selecting the fields and qualifiers to turn up the desired recordset, it would be nice if I could save the query for when I use it, or a slight variation, again, and again, and again. There should be opportunity to edit the saved search.
4) Save a Select People Sequence. Groups are not dynamic in RootsMagic, and I am Very okay with that. The Select people window is very powerful for creating a list of people. It would be nice if macros for selecting a list of people could be created. This way, after people have been created and edited, an updated list could be easily created.
5) Save a Color Scheme. Similar to above, but it is a series of colors applied to different lists of people.
Posted 24 March 2014 - 01:56 PM
We are all limited by our visions and abilities
Whilst we can borrow from the visions of others we cannot always deliver.
User of Family Historian 6.2.7, Rootsmagic 7.6.2, Family Tree Maker 2014 & Legacy 7.5
Posted 25 March 2014 - 11:30 AM
In the mean time, because I often forget what criteria I used to create a group, I have started to keep track of them in my To-Do List. It's getting big enough I should probably add them as one research log. Then I can "print" the list and work from it.
Posted 25 March 2014 - 02:05 PM
Well, you are way better than me if you only "often" forget what criteria you used to create a group. I "always" forget the criteria.
In the mean time, because I often forget what criteria I used to create a group, I have started to keep track of them in my To-Do List. It's getting big enough I should probably add them as one research log.
Actually, I have attacked the problem a different way, but it's surely not as good as using the To-Do list or the Research Log. If I can't remember what a group is for, I just delete it. I never have more than three or four groups at a time. i used to have forty or fifty groups at a time, and that was completely unmanageable. Sometimes I have to create a group not too long after I might have deleted it. But even if I had an elaborate procedure to keep up with group criteria, in the absence of Dynamic Groups I have to reapply the criteria manually anyway.
Finally, I can't help but note that your repurposing of the Research Log in this manner is yet another example of how the Research Log seems to work a great deal better than the To-Do list. And as always I can't really explain why the Research Log works so much better for me than does the To-Do list. It just does.
Posted 25 March 2014 - 03:36 PM
I should have caught earlier, especially in previous posts from Laura, that groups could be made from the color-coding. While this is an excellent useful feature in the current program, and I sure I’ll be taking much advantage of it, something more or different is needed.
Since I do not have a large database, I have no real empiric sense of what would cause congestion, or what actions would take a hideously long time, but this does seem to be an elephant to work around -- that and keeping the interface simple, intuitive, flexible, and powerful.
There is much to absorb from this and the previous discussions from 2009, 2010 and 2012.
Still considering work on sources a priority over this,
Posted 25 March 2014 - 07:12 PM
As Renee suggests, a Research log to refer to for previous searches you will want to do again for other Groups would work for me although I haven't created one yet.
Every user has their own choices of what should be the priorities for changes to RM. Right now mine would be Groups and Research logs because that is what I am working most with. It might change tomorrow.