Online Publisher photo captions and shared facts/notes
#1
Posted 21 November 2012 - 07:06 PM
First when your on the persons web page, it is not showing the shared facts properly. For example if I have a census fact shared and in each person I have a custom note. The old html generator would show this custom note ok. On the new publisher it only shows the primary person's note. So if I click on the note for say the 1891 census for a child it shows her fathers note and not hers. Same issue with say a note for a baptism sponsor etc.
Another thing last night in the webinar Bruce said that the photos would show a caption. They are not showing any captions or descriptions for me and I did double check they do show in my RM6 database.
#2
Posted 22 November 2012 - 07:30 AM
: exploiting the database in special ways >>>
: a growing bundle of utilities in an easy app.
#3
Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:31 AM
TomH, on 22 November 2012 - 07:30 AM, said:
Thank Tom, my captions are not in the metadata, I'm working at going through and adding them that way. But currently they are entered only in RM and are not showing on the site. I've also tried moving the mouse off the photo and it still doesn't show.
#4
Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:35 AM
: exploiting the database in special ways >>>
: a growing bundle of utilities in an easy app.
#5
Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:46 AM
I also tried unchecking the photo box and leaving only the primary photo box checked. Doing it this way produces no photos. Checking the share photos AND the only primary photos box produced one image for each person AND all source and fact images.
I would LOVE LOVE it if we could mark individual images as private when adding them to the database. In some cases you might want to show multiple photos for an ancestor but have a few that were given to you and may have been asked not to publish them. Or they could be photos from books that you can't republish, but keep for personal use.
You might only have 1 photo of a person and have it set as a primary photo, but can not for what ever reason post it online. So being able to mark it private would also help in that situation.
#6
Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:55 AM
TomH, on 22 November 2012 - 08:35 AM, said:
Thank Tom, I have that page booked marked.
#7
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:57 AM
#8
Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:27 PM
alansogd, on 22 November 2012 - 10:57 AM, said:
You've done a great job with the new websites.
I will go back and create a smaller file and see if that works.
But in the mean time, I did upload it to my site on RootsWeb Freepages, here is the link http://freepages.roo...ills/index.html
I've been playing with the html for the home page a bit and added my site counter, links and guestbook but other wise have not touched the files.
#9
Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:46 PM
You can see an example of the mixed up shared notes on this person http://my.rootsmagic...dual.html#37576 The census notes shown are the ones entered in her husbands note not hers.
For some odd yet good reason after remaking my site the photo captions are showing.
But you can see that the fact and source images are showing, when I had selected only primary photos.
Hope this helps!
#10
Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:09 PM
: exploiting the database in special ways >>>
: a growing bundle of utilities in an easy app.
#11
Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:22 PM
That does help, thank you. It looks like the root of the problem is in the data being exported by RootsMagic, so it is not in my power to solve it by myself
But I'll make sure it makes it into our bug tracker.
As of right now, RootsMagic also does not export Photo descriptions -- only captions. This may be extended later but it isn't a priority as far as I know.
Tom, good catch on that bug. It is almost surely because of the accent, and I'll take a look at it more carefully next week after the holidays.
#12
Posted 22 November 2012 - 06:46 PM
TomH, on 22 November 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:
Ahh thanks for catching that Tom! With French and Swedish ancestry quite a few names have accents...
#13
Posted 22 November 2012 - 06:54 PM
alansogd, on 22 November 2012 - 05:22 PM, said:
That does help, thank you. It looks like the root of the problem is in the data being exported by RootsMagic, so it is not in my power to solve it by myself
But I'll make sure it makes it into our bug tracker.
As of right now, RootsMagic also does not export Photo descriptions -- only captions. This may be extended later but it isn't a priority as far as I know.
Tom, good catch on that bug. It is almost surely because of the accent, and I'll take a look at it more carefully next week after the holidays.
Thanks for checking it out!
#14
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:00 PM
TomH, on 22 November 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:
Ok I wanted to test this out. I found the ONE Hebert in my file that had the accent on their name and removed that. I'm in the process of uploading a new copy, but as it's already gotten past the H section I can see that it fixed the problem. http://freepages.roo...l#Haber|Hebert So the accents must be messing something up.
#15
Posted 23 November 2012 - 09:11 AM
By the way, the accent is definitely the problem. The default sorting algorithm puts accented letters after the end of the alphabet, so it is almost like sorting "Hzbert-Hynan", which would return no results. Taking out the accents is a fine workaround until we update with a fix.
#16
Posted 24 November 2012 - 06:54 AM
I did create a second account and upload another file, but then I was told on another Board that we could have two. Perhaps not? Although why would the old file keep reappearing on the original site.
Actually I answered this myself. I had to clear the cache in my browser - the new website had replaced the old one!
#17
Posted 24 November 2012 - 08:38 AM
There have also been problems arising from the time it takes for the my.rootsmagic.com server to complete the Delete Website task. Start an upload too soon and some of the new files might be deleted. But it is advisable to delete because old files that are not replaced by the new upload remain and browser history may well point to them.
It would be preferable if there was a Sync My Website function in addition to or instead of the full upload. It would simply ensure that the online website mirrored the local master by uploading only new or revised files and deleting those online ones not present in the master. Hmmm, I guess I'm thinking of a model where one grows a website a few files at a time, not this full website at a time where every file except the JavaScript, style and icon files are new, even though many might be identical to the old. For efficiency, instead of time stamp comparisons, the server would have to return a list of files with checksums to the client for it to decide what actions to take.
: exploiting the database in special ways >>>
: a growing bundle of utilities in an easy app.
#18
Posted 24 November 2012 - 09:13 AM
Because the websites are stored on Amazon S3 (it is the most cost effective for making a free service like this), I don't have control over HTTP headers so I can't force the browser not to cache files. However, if RootsMagic exports a new version number for each update (which it doesn't, yet), I can use this to force the redownload of updated assets.
Tom, the deletion issue has been fixed. Deletions are usually much faster now, and they are cancelled if they are running when you start a new upload, so you shouldn't get a conflict. In addition, uploads now manually delete several important config files so information from your old site won't conflict with a newly uploaded site. If it looks like there's a conflict, it is extremely likely that it is a local caching issue rather than conflicting data on the server itself.
I agree that it would be a great for RootsMagic to keep track of only the changed files so uploads could be a lot smaller, and we've talked about it a little bit over here. It's a lot of work on the desktop side to keep track of the additional information, and we decided not to deal with it at this time. It is possible that in the future this discussion will come up again and you may see a feature like this.
#19
Posted 24 November 2012 - 09:28 AM
: exploiting the database in special ways >>>
: a growing bundle of utilities in an easy app.
#20
Posted 24 November 2012 - 01:58 PM
TomH, on 24 November 2012 - 09:28 AM, said:
Unlike anything we usually see from the rest of the staff. (Other than "it's been added to the tracking system"). Your participation and candor is indeed refreshing.











